Prepare
You can double or even triple the impact of every lecture, reading, or video with just five minutes of preparation. The approach is straightforward: prime your brain before you learn.
Most students walk into learning cold. Priming warms up your brain so it has more space, optimized attention, and an easier time integrating new knowledge.
Priming means activating what you already know before new learning begins. This “wakes up” related pathways so new information connects more easily [1]. When done effectively, it also builds a mental framework so your knowledge can be organized and understood in context. Priming is well-known to improve comprehension and enhance your ability to encode and organize new material [2].
The reasons can be summarized through 3 powerful benefits:
1. Reduced Cognitive Load – Free up mental space
The human capacity for conscious processing is very limited. Going into a learning event cold means your working memory will be bombarded by unfamiliar concepts, new terminology, etc.
But if you’ve encountered those ideas before, even briefly, they require less working memory capacity to process [3].
This freed-up bandwidth allows you to actively process the core ideas as they’re being taught, rather than getting bogged down in unfamiliar details.
2. Sharper Selective Attention – Focus on what matters
Priming helps your brain focus on what matters. Even before you consciously know what’s important, your brain starts to filter and prioritize relevant information [4].
Since working memory is extremely limited, your brain needs allocate processing power strategically during learning. Priming gives it a "head start", allowing it to optimize this limited capacity ahead of time.
3. Temporary Neural Plasticity – Make learning stick
By reactivating related neural pathways in memory, they become malleable for a window of time, allowing new information to be integrated more easily into these existing pathways [5]. This results in stronger initial encoding, making future study much more efficient.
While all forms of priming support these three effects, retrieval-based priming maximizes them.
Retrieval-based priming:
Retrieval-based priming involves actively recalling relevant prior knowledge before a learning event, which prepares the brain to better organize and integrate new information. This means remembering information, rather than being passively exposed to it. Effortful reconstruction of knowledge strengthens memory traces and prepares your brain to connect new ideas more robustly than through passive review [6].
The most effective retrieval strategy depends on the type of knowledge to be learned. We'll define two main categories: declarative (information) or procedural (problem-solving) knowledge.
Declarative Knowledge: Use Free Recall
Declarative knowledge refers to facts and concepts, as opposed to procedures (like biology as opposed to mathematics). To prepare for declarative learning, spend a few minutes performing a free recall: write or recite everything you know about the topic from memory.
Free recall is extremely powerful and versatile. Among its many benefits, a key advantage to priming is that it makes integrating future knowledge significantly easier.
Don't worry if you're unsure, just try it anyway. Since we're following with feedback, even partial or incorrect recall improves learning [7].
Then, look up an actual overview of the topic. A google search or AI-generated query will work.
-
If you were right, great.
-
If you weren't: even better. You can quickly correct these gaps by reading a bit about the topic. This understanding will be strongly encoded since it follows retrieval [8].
When it comes to such information-heavy knowledge, it's worth considering the return on your time investment as you research the topic. Everything you already understand prior to learning will make the learning event that much easier. But you'll see diminishing returns quickly.
To get the most "bang for your buck" it helps to focus on just the big ideas. Knowing the big picture makes learning new details easier because it gives your brain a framework to fit them into. To build a basic framework, ask these questions:
-
How does this topic connect to the bigger picture of this course?
-
What are the main components of this topic and how do they interact?
Understanding the basic organizational structure of the content pays dividends during learning. Research has found that students who grasped overarching concepts first could process new information with less cognitive load, making learning more efficient [13, 14].
Imagine you’re about to go to a lecture about cell signaling pathways in a biology course. After recalling what you know already you ask and a couple questions:
-
How does this topic connect to the bigger picture of biology?
→ Cell signaling explains how cells communicate and respond to their environment, which is fundamental to understanding physiology and disease. -
What are the main components of cell signaling and how do they interact?
→ Key components include receptors, second messengers, and downstream effectors. They all interact to transmit and amplify signals.
Procedural Knowledge: Try 2 Practice Problems
For problem-solving-type subjects (like math, chemistry, physics, etc.):
-
Attempt two problems before the lesson.
-
Check each answer against a worked solution.
Why two problems? One gives you a first exposure: you see the surface mechanics. The second forces you to test whether you’ve actually learned the pattern rather than just mimicked an example. Findings indicate that even a small amount of varied practice makes your brain start encoding the general structure of a problem type instead of just the details of one solution [9].
A meta-analysis comprising 55 studies has found that viewing worked examples had a moderately positive effect on subsequent learning [22]. It is especially important to verify your understanding of procedures after attempting them, to avoid reinforcing incorrect methods. A good place to find worked solutions may be textbook, or my preference: a YouTube tutorial.
Procedural practice becomes even more effective when you talk yourself through the reasoning step-by-step — especially the conceptual "why" behind each move. That plain-language reasoning makes underlying principles more salient and helps you notice mismatches between your conceptual understanding and the mechanical steps you're using to solve the problem [15]. This kind of self-explanation not only deepens conceptual insight but also enhances processing by engaging more cognitive resources [16, 17] through mechanisms like dual coding [18]. It’s no surprise, then, that students who use conceptual self-explanation perform better when tested [19,20].
The effect size of procedural self-explanation can be staggering. Consider a study in which students were tasked with solving a logic puzzle in one of three ways and then were tested on an abstract version of that puzzle designed to test their understanding [21]. The control group (no self-explanation) averaged 28% accuracy in the abstract task. The retrospective self-explanation group (explained after solving each problem) averaged 68% accuracy. The concurrent self-explanation group (explained while solving each problem) averaged 90% accuracy. Wow! These types of transfer questions are tests of deeps understanding, the kind that tend to trick students on real exams. A jump from 28%->90% for these questions can make a stunning difference on your next physics exam.
One more benefit:
Retrieval-based priming does more than reduce mental load. Like any retrieval, it also builds metacognitive awareness—you enter the learning already knowing what you understand and what you don’t, so you know where to focus to fill those gaps [10].
This "conscious focus" effect works in parallel with the unconscious selective attention mentioned above. Retrieval-based priming not only allows yor brain to filters information unconsciously but also provides a conscious map of your knowledge gaps. Both your conscious and unconscious systems work together to guide your focus.
This metacognitive awareness turns vague confusion into clear, specific questions, helping you avoid the common trap of “I don’t get it, and I don’t know why.”
Time the prime: > 5 minutes before lectures
Retrieving knowledge puts the corresponding neural pathways into a temporary, flexible state. like soft clay. They’re more receptive to integration with new information [11]. But this state fades over time, so ideally, your learning happens while those networks are still “soft.”
So it's a good idea to prime right before the learning event for self-paced learning (like readings and videos).
But for lectures in particular, I would recommend a delay of at least 5 minutes between the priming and the lecture.
Retrieval-based priming is powerful, but it’s also mentally taxing. If you do it right before a lecture or deep study, you deplete some of the very working memory and focus you’ll need most during the learning itself. A short delay allows your brain to recover and reallocate resources effectively, keeping you fresh and attentive for the upcoming lecture. After all, it can cost you a lot of time in the future if you lose attention during a fast-paced lecture. And this delay usually isn't a hindrance for in-person lectures since it usually takes some time to walk there anyways.
Additionally, this pause allows your selective attention system to "calibrate". After retrieval, your brain works behind the scenes—tagging important concepts and making them attentional priorities. It can't consolidate as effectively while you're actively learning [12], and you won’t learn as effectively until that priming has been consolidated. This is especially important in lectures because falling behind can be deleterious: every bit of attention counts.
Summary:
Just a few minutes of smart retrieval primes your brain far more effectively than passive review. You’ve lightened your cognitive load, freeing up valuable mental space.
That extra capacity is now focused more strategically, guided by both your conscious and unconscious selective attention.
At the same time, your neural pathways have been softened and sensitized, ready to absorb new information more deeply.
And if you’ve timed it right, your brain has consolidated the framework and is fully fresh and tuned for the upcoming lecture.
Efficiency Amplifiers:
Core Benefits of Priming
-
Reduced Cognitive Load (Free up mental space)
-
Sharper Selective Attention (Subconsciously focus on what matters):
-
Temporary Neural Plasticity (Make learning stick)
Retrieval-Based Priming (Most Effective Form)
-
Effortful Reconstruction (Actively recalling information):
-
Error-Driven Correction (Checking against a reliable source):
-
Metacognitive Awareness (Consciously know your gaps before learning begins)
Declarative Knowledge Priming (Concepts & Facts)
-
Framework Activation (Understanding headings, key ideas, or general gist)
Procedural Knowledge Priming (Problem-Solving / Skills)
-
First Attempt Exposure (Activate procedural schema):
-
Second Attempt Variation (Force generalization beyond mimicry):
-
Worked Example Feedback (Clarify structure & fix mistakes):
-
Procedural Self-explanation (metacognitive understanding)
Timing of Priming (Lectures)
-
Recovery of Working Memory (Let your brain refresh after taxing recall)
-
Attentional Calibration (Brain tags important concepts in the background)
References:
1. Tulving, E., & Schacter, D. L. (1990). Priming and human memory systems. Science, 247(4940), 301–306. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2296719 2. van Kesteren, M. T. R., Ruiter, D. J., Fernández, G., & Henson, R. N. (2012). How schema and novelty augment memory formation. Trends in Neurosciences, 35(4), 211–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2012.02.001 3. Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1999). Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13(4), 351–371. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199908)13:43.0.CO;2-6 4. Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1998). Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36(1), 28–71. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1998.0681 5. Anderson, J. R. (1984). The architecture of cognition. Harvard University Press. 6. Karpicke, J. D., & Blunt, J. R. (2011). Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping. Science, 331(6018), 772–775. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1199327 7. Kornell, N., & Bjork, R. A. (2007). The promise and perils of self-regulated study. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(2), 219–224. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194055 8. Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2008). Feedback enhances the positive effects and reduces the negative effects of multiple-choice testing. Memory & Cognition, 36(3), 604–616. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.3.604 9. Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (2011). Making things hard on yourself, but in a good way: Creating desirable difficulties to enhance learning. In M. A. Gernsbacher, R. W. Pew, L. M. Hough, & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.), Psychology and the real world: Essays illustrating fundamental contributions to society (pp. 56–64). Worth Publishers. 10. Kornell, N. (2014). Metacognition in humans and animals. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(5), 255–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414545881 11. Nader, K., Schafe, G. E., & Le Doux, J. E. (2000). Fear memories require protein synthesis in the amygdala for reconsolidation after retrieval. Nature, 406(6797), 722–726. https://doi.org/10.1038/35021052 12. Fischer, S., Born, J., & Diekelmann, S. (2006). Sleep forms memory for finger skills. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(18), 7128–7133. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0602294103 13. Mayer, R. E. (2003). The promise of multimedia learning: Using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00016-6 14. van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Sweller, J. (2005). Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 17(2), 147–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-005-3951-0 15. Schwartz, D. L., & Martin, T. (2004). Inventing to prepare for future learning: The hidden efficiency of encouraging original problem construction. Cognition and Instruction, 22(2), 129–184. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2202_1 16. Renkl, A. (1997). Learning from worked-out examples: A study on individual differences in learning from worked-out examples with respect to the quality of self-explanations. Learning and Instruction, 7(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(96)00015-2 17. Renkl, A. (2002). Worked-out examples: Instructional explanations support learning by self-explanations. Learning and Instruction, 12(5), 529–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00029-7 18. Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie, 45(3), 255–287. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0084295 19. Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13(2), 145–182. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1302_1 20. Chi, M. T. H., De Leeuw, N., Chiu, M. H., & Lavancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18(3), 439–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(94)90016-7 21. Berry, D. C. (1983). Metacognitive experience and transfer of logical reasoning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35(1), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640748308402115 22. Barbieri, C. A., Miller-Cotto, D., Clerjuste, S. N., & Chawla, K. (2023). A meta-analysis of the worked examples effect on mathematics performance. Educational Psychology Review, 35(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09745-1